DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOAPD FOR Cc OPPRPECTION ne WAN AL preopne
=- miter fe
201 Ss GOUR TASS *
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2499
UT
vor
Docket No NR10582-14
a “~- eel = = a el
st Pereiliwe=+ owe +
Dear Gunnery —— |
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
a three-member panel of the Board for Correct
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 December 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings St this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. Tn addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Ma
Review Board (PERB) , dated 16
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Boare found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material
error or injustice In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB
accordingly, your application has been denied The names and
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your ca
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are é
the Board reconsi isi bmissi
evidence within one yeer from the date of th
Q:
0
R
p
eT
mn
a
D
)
i
w
O
a
ce
G
Oo
5
n
e
U
3
=
ow
mn
New evidence ig evidence not previously considerea YP} th
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10853-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 19 December 2002,’ a copy of which is attached. VIRGINIA Y S 134-LI 1 OS IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB DEC 1 2002 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08254-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested fitness report for 1 September 1999 to 30 April 2000 by adding the revised reviewing officer comments dated 9 October deleting the nonconcurrence with the mark assigned in item H. 1 (evaluation of your responsibility as a reporting official). In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 November 2001, a copy of which is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03140-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 April 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11662 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08305-00
MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR SMC adverse report at the time the report is prepared. 1610 MMER/PERB 6 ; OEC MU MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) TION IN THE CASE OF USMC (a) (b) DD Form 149 of 7 Sep 00 Ch l-6 Per 1. with three members present, MC0 161O.llC, the Performance Evaluation Review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9364 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08032-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 11 January 2002, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner has not substantiated his allegations disclaiming performance counseling and undue influence on the Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION MASTER SERGEANT C part of Gunnery Sergeants insigh to gain first-hand briefing offic Senior (Captai (Lieutenant Co e-mail...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07837-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board 2000, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director _- Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00767-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATE6 MARINE CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-8 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2 5 JAN 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02627-07
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this case, the Board found that there is no clear cut evidence to support the petitioner’s claim that this was an...